Which Skills do Students Need to Be Successful?
Ethical Analysis of Public-Private Commercial Arrangements in Academia

What Should Be Done About Students Buying a Test Bank

Are Students Responsible or Instructors?

Last week I received a notification from the American Accounting Association that said: “As you may know, most textbook publisher’s test banks and solution manuals can be purchased online or are free, which cause an unlevel playing field for students.” The Association asked for volunteers to form a committee with the goal of preparing a series of new multiple choice and true/false questions that, presumably, couldn’t be accessed and bought on line.

Websites offer plenty of ways to buy textbook instructors' manuals that include "test banks" — questions and answers provided by textbook publishers to professors. Professors sometimes use these test banks to devise their own tests. Shame on them for not adjusting their style of testing given the ready availability of test banks.

Back in 2010 a cheating scandal was uncovered at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Administrators said one or more students in a senior-level business class purchased a test bank for the textbook "Strategic Management: A Dynamic Perspective Concept and Cases." Then it was shared with some 200 classmates in the strategic management class. The course instructor used that same 300-question test bank — which he thought secure — to create his midterm exam.

The grades on the midterm were unusually high, and UCF soon had a cheating scandal that made national news.

The incident sparked debates about academic integrity and questions about whether test banks are legitimate study guides or unethical glimpses at potential exams. To me, this is a no-brainer. It’s cheating because the goal (intention for one’s action) is to gain an unfair advantage over other students who play by the rules. It creates an unlevel playing field.

UCF found that the students involved committed academic misconduct, but it was an isolated incident at a university regarded as a national leader in the effort to combat cheating, said Provost Tony Waldrop. Waldrop said that in the wake of the business class incident, he has put together a "working group" to suggest ways UCF can improve its existing "safeguards."

Donald McCabe, a business professor at Rutgers University who studies cheating on college campuses, said the UCF case is one of the biggest in recent years but also not clear cut. Students studying the test bank might not have known the exact questions would be on their midterm.

"If they thought they were using it as a study guide, it's hard to argue they were blatantly cheating," McCabe said. McCabe is wrong because our ethical behavior (or unethical behavior) is determined based on our intentions. Saying the students might not have known the exact questions is a rationalization for an unethical action. Shame on Professor McCabe for not knowing the difference.

Still, McCabe said his surveys on college cheating suggest the problem is serious and perhaps getting worse. About 21 percent of students admit to serious test cheating, with more problems on large campuses and in large lecture classes.  Book

Today's students seem to feel "less guilty about taking short cuts" to get good grades, he said, and test banks are one of the newest ways students try to get ahead. Here, I agree with the professor because the cheating students’ actions illustrate an end justifies the means approach to decision making. It didn’t matter to the students that they were cheating as long as buying the text bank enabled them, to maximize their course grade. 

I have an accounting ethics textbook titled Ethical Obligations and Decision Making in Accounting: Text and Cases. I Googled buying the test bank for the book and a few sights came right up. On one sight, it would cost $24.99, a reduction from $34.99 (undoubtedly because the test bank is out there so supply exceeds new demand). I’ve known about this for a while and always get depressed when I find out students in my accounting ethics class bought the test bank.

Blog posted by Steven Mintz, aka Ethics Sage, on April 4, 2018. Visit Dr. Mintz’s website to sign up for his newsletter.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Brandon Steven

Great article! so much informative and interesting. Guidelines cover in this blog should be followed by all students that try test books rather than taking short cuts. I would like to share this article with my friends, relatives and colleagues so that they get to know more ways to develop personality of their children.

Roger Scott

I totally agree with Dr. Mintz, the boundary between using test bank as study guides and cheating is so blurry. One one side students can purchase test bank or solutions manual from http://www.testbank.org on the basis that they were using them for preparing exams. But on the other side, the professor or instructor should find creative ways to modify the exam or quiz questions and not just merely copy and paste the questions from the test bank.

Anonymous College Student

This is a bunch of malarkey and underscores a blatant lack of knowledge on the part of those calling this cheating.

There is one single predictive measure that statistically dwarfs all others in terms of ability to predict student performance. It's not how long you study, how hard you work, or how smart you are. It is how many practice tests you have.

I routinely purchase test bank books to accompany my textbooks. I also purchase strategy guides and solutions manuals. I take practice test after practice test based on those books. When I get something wrong, I use the solutions manual or strategy guide to identify my mistakes and then practice again with the newfound knowledge. I'm about to graduate with a 4.0 GPA and in the last three and a half years, not once has a purchased test bank question appeared on an exam and I would never expect them to.

If you're a teacher and just using test bank questions, the biggest thing it shows is that you are lazy.

Joe

Ridiculous. There is a level playing field already. Every student can seek out online and purchase a test bank. There is no unfair advantage for the student who wants to put in the extra effort in buying another study resource. It’s s lazy instructor who got caught .

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)